Sustainable Business Models and IT Innovation: The Case of the REMIT

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Oleg Balatskyi Department of Management, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.

2 Economic Cybernetics Department, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.

3 Department of Information Systems and Technologies, National University Of Life And Environmental Sciences Of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

4 Department of Financial Management and Stock Market, Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, Ukraine.

5 Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Odessa I.I.Mechnikov National University, Odessa, Ukraine.

6 Department of Economics and Business Technology, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.


This paper aimed to explore IT innovations used in sustainable business models in the European single energy market. For this purpose, the academic literature and content analyses of organized marketplaces were performed. The results showed that end users are not always interested in changing the service and try to choose services/resources well known to them. At the same time, market operators see the need for radical change by introducing strategic innovations and digitizing energy markets. Sustainable e-government management models are typically sustained by IoT, blockchain, and smart grid management technologies.



Efficient energy markets can provide equal rights for their participants by reducing discrimination and fluctuations in the supply and demand of energy resources (Elmore and Dowling, 2021). Over the last decade, energy technologies and regulations have changed significantly, allowing wholesale trade in renewable energy sources (Telizhenko et al., 2016). There is a tendency to digitize energy infrastructure, use IT innovations, and build smart grids (Sha and Aiello, 2020; Kolosok et al., 2021). At the present stage of development, IT technologies are being implemented for smart grid management, energy distribution and consumption measurement, and solutions to decarbonize the economy (Vakulenko et al., 2021).

Regional transactive energy markets are emerging, where end consumers actively buy and sell energy (Mohy-Ud-Din et al., 2019; Papalexopoulos, 2021). The development of regional energy markets, in turn, is a driver of the rapid spread of renewable energy sources (Lyeonov et al., 2019; Ziabina et al., 2020; Fernandez et al., 2021). The decision-making structure in such systems has changed significantly as it is necessary to balance distributed energy resources to meet local demand (Bahramara et al., 2018).

Economic agents can simultaneously use sustainable business models to achieve environmental, economic, and social goals (Vasylieva et al., 2019; Mendel et al., 2020; Pavlyk, 2020). Moreover, the innovation component is one of the critical categories of such models (Nosratabadi et al., 2019; Lyulyov, Vakulenko et al., 2021). Therefore, this research explores the innovations used in sustainable business models in Europeean single energy market.

This article contains four sections. After the introduction section, the data and methods section describing the research methodology follow. Section 3 contains the main results and discussion. And the conclusions finalize this study in section 4.

Data and Methods 

The combined approach in this article was used to study IT innovations used in sustainable business models in the European single energy market. Initially, an analysis of the academic literature on this issue was performed. Thus, the existing concepts of sustainable business models in the energy sector and research gaps were tested.

After that, the authors performed a content analysis of the texts of the websites of organized marketplaces to understand which business models are practice organized marketplaces - considering the obligation of market participants to publicly disclose information on businesses or facilities under Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council (2011) in compliance with organized marketplaces business rules. The general methodology of the study is shown in Figure 1. The list of organized marketplaces was extructed on August 16, 2021, from the website of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER).

After checking the duplication and inaccuracy of the data, a total of 79 marketplaces were selected. Most of the platforms on the list belonged to the category of “energy exchange” (38 organizations) and “energy broker platform” (36 organizations). Only five organizations fell into the category of “other organized marketplace.” Business registers and transparency registers were used to verify the legal information of marketplaces. Despite a comprehensive approach to the study, official information could not be found on all organizations from the list of marketplaces.

The final stage of the study was a textual analysis of the content collected from the websites of organized marketplaces.


Figure 1. Diagram of the general research methodology

Source: conducted by authors

Results and Discussion

Joint initiatives in the energy sector in Europe have been focused on building a single energy market for several decades. Environmental projects of the day of development of competitive and transparent energy markets are financed and implemented, promoting the European Green Deal (Cebula and Pimonenko, 2015; Paskevicius and Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene, 2018; Gontareva et al., 2020; Ziabina and Kovalenko, 2021; Lyulyov, Pimonenko et al., 2021).

Investing in sustainable development is an essential step towards achieving a carbon-neutral Europe (Chigrin and Pimonenko, 2014; Kendiukhov and Tvaronaviciene, 2017; Lyulyov, Paliienko et al., 2021). The importance of building the existing energy infrastructure in Europe is also unconditional. The integration of existing distributed capacities (including renewable energy sources) into the internal energy market systems remains a strategically important task. However, it isn't easy to find the optimum between the ambitious goals of the EU and the national interests of individual economies.

In the future, investments for European integration should be directed to the harmonization of the operating conditions of the European electricity infrastructure and the rules of balancing gas and electricity (Kolosok et al., 2018; Samusevych et al., 2021; Vasylieva et al, 2021). At the same time, creating organizational, economic mechanisms for disseminating technological innovation in energy is considered a strategic priority for a united Europe (Kozmenko and Vasyl'yeva, 2008; Salihaj and Pryimenko, 2017; Vasylieva et al., 2018). The diffusion of technologies for active demand management, smart energy use, and energy efficiency greatly impacts the level of development of organizations and the emergence of energy communities (Prokopenko et al., 2017; Vasilyeva, Bilan et al., 2020; Skrynnyk and Vasilyeva, 2020).

Peer-to-peer (p2p) energy communities are becoming more widespread (Duvignau et al., 2021; Iqbal et al., 2021). However, such models are still not widespread (Tushar et al., 2021). According to a study by Plewnia and Guenther (2021), Germany mainly operates virtual p2p communities that stimulate the dissemination of new sustainable technologies. However, despite their capabilities, such business models still do not benefit local energy communities. Montakhabi et al. (2021), in the context of the study of the electricity market in Flanders, emphasize the importance of citizens in the implementation of p2p models. New roles are emerging in the energy market, which requires updating existing business models, analyzing trends, and forecasting scenarios for the interaction of economic agents.

However, new business models also have significant risks associated with their viability (Starchenko et al., 2021; Babenko et al., 2020; Gryshchenko et al., 2022). Renewable energy sources can be pushed out of the market after the abolition offixed feed-in tariff (Vasylieva, Machová et al., 2020; Vysochyna et al., 2020; El Amri et al., 2021; Štreimikienė et al., 2021). New renewable energy infrastructure models need to be created to be more flexible (Vasylieva et al., 2017; Thomas, 2020) and not distort wholesale prices in the electricity market, especially during peak electricity generation from renewable sources (Rövekamp et al., 2021; Rodchenko et al., 2019). In addition, the current daily pricing model is vulnerable to fluctuations in the prices of distributed energy resources. Intermediate auctions should be conducted based on intraday processes in each regional market to balance prices (Newman and MacDougall, 2021; Kuznetsov et al., 2020; Danylyshyn et al., 2019; Bondarenko et al., 2019).

Despite reforms and liberalization of the EU energy market, falling wholesale prices do not lead to falling retail energy prices for final consumers. Instead, energy prices exceed the average inflation index in Europe (Li, 2018). The results of the Valitov and Maier study (2020) in the German market show the impact of publicly available information on unplanned power outages on the average daily price of electricity on the stock exchange, which contradicts the rules of the REMIT (Regulation on Wholesale Energy Market Integrity and Transparency). In addition, Tesfamicael et al. (2020) emphasize that wholesale trade in electricity is carried out through unsecured communications in modern conditions.

Niessen and Bocken (2021), examining the steady models of different companies, found that most popular concepts requiring a minor affort. "Green alternative" and "Design" strategies were most popular among the respondents, while radical solutions, sush as "Exchange platforms" and "Demand reduction services" did not find significant support.

According to the "Report on Innovative Business Models and Consumer Protection Challenges" (CEER, 2021), end-users are not motivated to shift the interacting within the electricity market. Users consciously do not want changes and choose services/resources well known to them, avoiding new solutions.

At the same time, market operators see the need for radical change by introducing strategic innovations and digitizing energy markets. It is seen that this will lead to better service for market participants and the gradual abandonment of paper documents. The new model of electronic software management is usually supported by IoT, blockchain, and smart grid management technologies.

Interregional balance platforms offer trading activities and services for different markets. Virtual outlets on such platforms regulate bilateral trade in energy resources for the "entry/exit market model." Typically, such market models contain two such procedures:

- Multilateral trading,

- Bilateral trading.

Considering the textual content of organized marketplaces (Figure 2), among the innovative business models are platforms for trading in gas products. Gas products can be supplied with such tools as:

- Virtual Balancing Point (PVB),

- Virtual Trading Point (VTP),

- Virtual Balancing Tank (TVB) etc.


Figure 2. Textual analysis of market places content

Source: conducted by authors



This study aimed to examine IT innovations used in sustainable business models in Europe's single energy market. For this purpose, the analysis of academic literature and content analysis of organized market places was performed. Data for text analysis was collected from several platforms: the ACER, business registers and transparency register, websites of organized marketplaces.

The analysis results show that end users are not always interested in changing the service and try to choose services/resources that are well known to them. There is a need to better inform users and consumers of services about innovative technologies and sustainable business models used in the energy market. Unfortunately, finding information about sustainable business models on corporate service providers' websites is not always possible.

At the same time, market operators see the need for radical change by introducing strategic innovations and digitizing energy markets. It is seen that this will lead to better service for market participants and the gradual abandonment of paper documents. Sustainable e-government management models are typically backed by IoT, blockchain, and smart grid management technologies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence this paper exist.


This research was funded by the grants from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine “Reforming the lifelong learning system in Ukraine for the prevention of the labor emigration: a coopetition model of institutional partnership” (reg. n. 0120U102001), “Convergence of economic and educational transformations in the digital society: modeling the impact on regional and national security” (reg. n.0121U109553), “The optimization model of smart and secure energy grids building: an innovative technologies of enterprises and regions ecologisation” (reg. n.0119U100766).

Babenko, V.O., Yatsenko, R.M., Migunov, P.D., Salem, A.-B.M. (2020). MarkHub Cloud Online Editor as a modern web-based book creation tool. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Vol. 2643, pp. 174–184. URL:
Bahramara, S., Yazdani-Damavandi, M., Contreras, J., Shafie-Khah, M., & Catalão, J. P. S. (2018). Modeling the strategic behavior of a distribution company in wholesale energy and reserve markets. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4), 3857-3870.
Bondarenko, S., Verbivska, L., Dobrianskа, N., Iefimova, G., Pavlova, V. & Mamrotska O. (2019). Management of Enterprise Innovation Costs to Ensure Economic Security. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8 (3), 5609-5613.
Cebula, J., & Pimonenko, T. (2015). Comparison financing conditions of the development biogas sector in Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 30(2), 20-30.
CEER (2021). Report on innovative business models and consumer protection challenges.
Chigrin, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2014). The ways of corporate sector firms financing for sustainability of performance. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 29(3), 1-13.
Danylyshyn, B., Bondarenko, S., Malanchuk, M., Kucherenko, K., Pylypiv, V. & Usachenko O. (2019). Method of Real Options in Managing Investment Projects. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8 (10), 2696-2699.
Duvignau, R., Heinisch, V., Göransson, L., Gulisano, V., & Papatriantafilou, M. (2021). Benefits of small-size communities for continuous cost-optimization in peer-to-peer energy sharing. Applied Energy, 301, 117402.
El Amri, A., Oulfarsi, S., Boutti, R., Sahib Eddine, A., Hmioui, A. (2021). Carbon Financial Markets Underlying Climate Change Mitigation, Pricing and Challenges: Technical Analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(1), 5-17.
Elmore, C. T., & Dowling, A. W. (2021). Learning spatiotemporal dynamics in wholesale energy markets with dynamic mode decomposition. Energy, 232, 121013.
European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2011). Regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency.
Fernandez, E., Hossain, M. J., Mahmud, K., Nizami, M. S. H., & Kashif, M. (2021). A bi-level optimization-based community energy management system for optimal energy sharing and trading among peers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123254.
Gontareva, I., Babenko, V., Shmatko, N., Litvinov, O., Hanna, O. (2020). The Model of Network Consulting Communication at the Early Stages of Entrepreneurship. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, Vol. 16, pp. 390-396.
Gryshchenko, O., Babenko, V., Bilovodska, O., Voronkova, T., Ponomarenko, I., Shatskaya, Z. (2022). Green tourism business as marketing perspective in environmental management. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 8(1), 117-132.
Iqbal, S., Nasir, M., Zia, M. F., Riaz, K., Sajjad, H., & Khan, H. A. (2021). A novel approach for system loss minimization in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community DC microgrid. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 129, 106775.
Kendiukhov, I., & Tvaronaviciene, M. (2017). Managing innovations in sustainable economic growth. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (3), 33-42. 10.21272/mmi.2017.3-03
Kolosok, S., Bilan, Y., Vasylieva, T., Wojciechowski, A., & Morawski, M. (2021). A scoping review of renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energies, 14(15) doi:10.3390/en14154490
Kolosok, S., Dementov, V., Korol, S., & Panchenko, O. (2018). Public policy and international investment position in european integration of Ukraine. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(8), 2375-2384.
Kozmenko, S., & Vasyl'yeva, T. (2008). Specialized innovative investment banks in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems, 3(1), 48-56. doi:10.21511/bbs.3(1).2008.01
Kuznetsov, A., Smirnov, O., Gorbacheva, L., Babenko, V. (2020). Hiding data in images using a pseudo-random sequence. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2608, pp. 646-660.
Li, F. (2018). Lessons from market reform for renewable integration in the European Union. Frontiers in Energy, 12, 623–629.
Lyeonov, S., Pimonenko, T., Bilan, Y., Štreimikiene, D., & Mentel, G. (2019). Assessment of green investments' impact on sustainable development: Linking gross domestic product per capita, greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy. Energies, 12(20) doi:10.3390/en12203891
Lyulyov, O., Paliienko, M., Prasol, L., Vasylieva, T., Kubatko, O., & Kubatko, V. (2021). Determinants of shadow economy in transition countries: Economic and environmental aspects. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 43(2-3), 166-182.
Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Kwilinski, A., Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M., Pavlyk, V., & Barosz, P. (2021). The impact of the government policy on the energy efficient gap: The evidence from Ukraine. Energies, 14(2) doi:10.3390/en14020373
Lyulyov, O., Vakulenko, I., Pimonenko, T., Kwilinski, A., Dzwigol, H., & Dzwigol-Barosz, M. (2021). Comprehensive assessment of smart grids: Is there a universal approach? Energies, 14(12), 3497.
Mentel, G., Vasilyeva, T., Samusevych, Y., Vysochyna, A., Karbach, R., & Streimikis, J. (2020). The evaluation of economic, environmental and energy security: Composite approach. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 19(1-3), 177-195.
Mohy-Ud-Din, G., Muttaqi, K. M., & Sutanto, D. (2019). Transactive energy-based planning framework for VPPs in a co-optimised day-ahead and real-time energy market with ancillary services. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 13(11), 2173-2181.
Montakhabi, M., Zobiri, F., Van Der Graaf, S., Deconinck, G., Orlando, D., Ballon, P., & Mustafa, M. A. (2021). An Ecosystem View of Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading: Scenario Building by Business Model Matrix to Identify New Roles. Energies, 14(15), 4438.
Newman, J., & MacDougall, P. (2021). Increasing DER integration through discrete intraday settlements. Electricity Journal, 34(4), 106932.
Niessen, L., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2021). How can businesses drive sufficiency? the business for sufficiency framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1090-1103.
Nosratabadi, S., Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., Zavadskas, E. K., Rakotonirainy, A., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Sustainable business models: A review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6), 1663.
 Papalexopoulos, A. (2021). The evolution of the multitier hierarchical energy market structure: The emergence of the transactive energy model. IEEE Electrification Magazine, 9(3), 37-45.
Paskevicius, A., & Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene, G. (2018). The evaluation of the impact of financial technologies innovations on CEECs capital markets. Marketing and Management  of Innovations, 3, 241-252.
Pavlyk, V. (2020). Assessment of green investment impact on the energy efficiency gap of the national economy. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 117-123.
 Plewnia, F., & Guenther, E. (2021). The transition value of business models for a sustainable energy system: The case of virtual peer-to-peer energy communities. Organization and Environment, 34(3), 479-503.
Prokopenko, O., Cebula, J., Chayen, S., & Pimonenko, T. (2017). Wind energy in Israel, Poland and Ukraine: Features and opportunities. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 32(1), 98-107.
Rodchenko, L., Goncharenko, O., Koval, O., Tarasov, I., Nemchenko, H. & Tkachuk T. (2019). Optimization of Innovation Projects According To Criteria of Time and Resource Constraints. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 1431-1434.
 Rövekamp, P., Schöpf, M., Wagon, F., Weibelzahl, M., & Fridgen, G. (2021). Renewable electricity business models in a post feed-in tariff era. Energy, 216, 119228.
Salihaj, T., Pryimenko, S. (2017). Modification of the International Energy Agency Model (the IEA Model of Short-term Energy Security) for Assessing the Energy Security of Ukraine. SocioEconomic Challenges, 1(4), 95-103. DOI: 10.21272sec.1(4).95-103.2017
Samusevych, Y., Maroušek, J., Kuzmenko, O., Streimikis, J., & Vysochyna, A. (2021). Environmental taxes in ensuring national security: A structural optimization model. Journal of International Studies, 14(2), 292-312. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-2/19
 Sha, A., & Aiello, M. (2020). Topological considerations on peer-to-peer energy exchange and distributed energy generation in the smart grid. Energy Informatics, 3, 8.
 Skrynnyk, O., S., & Vasilyeva, T. (2020). Neuro-genetic hybrid system for management of organizational development measures. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2732, 411-422.
Starchenko, L.V., Samusevych, Ya., Demchuk, K. (2021). Social and Eco-Friendly Enterpreneurship: The Keys to Sustainability. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 118-126.
Štreimikienė, D., Samusevych, Y., Bilan, Y., Vysochyna, A., & Sergi, B. S. (2021). Multiplexing efficiency of environmental taxes in ensuring environmental, energy, and economic security. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16239-6
 Telizhenko, O., Shevchenko, T., & Mishenina, G. (2016). Sustainable management of the municipal solid waste resource potential in the context of product lifecycle continuity. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 7(4), 664-671.
 Tesfamicael, A. D., Liu, V., McKague, M., Caelli, W., & Foo, E. (2020). A design for a secure energy market trading system in a national wholesale electricity market. IEEE Access, 8, 132424-132445.
Thomas, G. (2020). Leadership Models and Leadership Styles as Success Factors in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(1), 35-42.
Tushar, W., Yuen, C., Saha, T. K., Morstyn, T., Chapman, A. C., Alam, M. J. E., Hanif, S., Poor, H. V. (2021). Peer-to-peer energy systems for connected communities: A review of recent advances and emerging challenges. Applied Energy, 282, 116131.
 Vakulenko, I., Saher, L., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2021). A systematic literature review of smart grids. E3S Web of Conferences, 250, 08006.
 Valitov, N., & Maier, A. (2020). Asymmetric information in the German intraday electricity market. Energy Economics, 89, 104785.
Vasilyeva, T., Bilan, S., Bagmet, K., & Seliga, R. (2020). Institutional development gap in the social sector: Crosscountry analysis. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 271-294. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/17
Vasylieva, T. A., Lieonov, S. V., Makarenko, I. O., & Sirkovska, N. (2017). Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects. Marketing and management of innovations, (4), 350-357.
Vasylieva, T., Harust, Yu., Vinnichenko, N., & Vysochyna, A. (2018). Optimization of the financial decentralization level as an instrument for the country’s innovative economic development regulation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 381- 390.
Vasylieva, T., Lyulyov, O., Bilan, Y., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption. Energies, 12(17) doi:10.3390/en12173289
Vasylieva, T., Machová, V., Vysochyna, A., Podgórska, J., & Samusevych, Y. (2020). Setting up architecture for environmental tax system under certain socioeconomic conditions. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 273-285. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/19
Vasylieva, T., Pavlyk, V., Bilan, Y., Mentel, G., & Rabe, M. (2021). Assessment of energy efficiency gaps: The case for Ukraine. Energies, 14(5) doi:10.3390/en14051323
Vysochyna, A., Samusevych, Y., & Starchenko, L. (2020). Convergence trends of environmental taxation in European countries. E3S Web of Conferences, 202 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202020203031
Ziabina, Ye., Kovalenko, Ye. (2021). Regularities In The Development Of The Theory Of Energy Efficiency Management. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(1), 117-132.
Ziabina, Ye., Pimonenko, T., Starchenko, L. (2020). Energy Efficiency Of National Economy: Social, Economic And Ecological Indicators. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 160-174.