Identification and Prioritization of Factors Contributing in Cloud Service Selection Using Fuzzy Best-worst Method (FBWM)

Document Type: Research Paper


1 PhD Candidate, Department of Information Technology Management, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Prof., Department of Information Technology Management, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.



The introduction of cloud computing techniques revolutionized the current of information processing and storing. Cloud computing as a competitive edge provides easy and automated access to the vast ocean of resources through standard network mechanisms to businesses and organizations. Due to the vast diversity of service providers and their respective variety of available services with different qualities, top managements often face difficulty for choosing the best available option. So, considering the growing significance of the mentioned issue, this study aims to identify and rank contributing factors in selection of cloud service providers. In that attempt, this research approaches its goal by going through three major phases. Firstly, in phase one, prior studies are reviewed for extracting related elements of selection. Secondly, by employing Fuzzy Delphi method and obtaining results by interviewing experts in this field such as IT managers and technicians, this study tries to finalize the list of contributing factors. Lastly, by utilizing Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, which is one of the most recent techniques employed to statistically rank variables, this research introduces a list of vital factors for cloud service selection. Based on the findings of this study, there are five major categories involved in the selection process which are: performance, security, data management, personal data protection and environmental-organizational. The finalized result of ranking shows that, performance related factors such as accessibility, response time and capacity are the first priority. The runner-up is security with reliability and governance. Environmental-organizational variables lands in the third place by considering rental and network costs.


Al-Faifi, A. M., Song, B., Hassan, M. M., Alamri, A., & Gumaei, A. (2018). Performance Prediction Model for Cloud Service Selection from Smart Data. Future Generation Computer systems, 85, 97-106.
Al-Khater N.R., (2017). A model of a Private Sector Organisation's Intention to Adopt Cloud Computing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. PhD. Dissertation.
Alsanea M., (2015). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Saudi Arabia’s Government Sector. PhD. Dissertation.
Anu A.S., (2016). Quality Model Based Decision Support System for Cloud Migration. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. Vol. 5, Issue 7.
Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., Rodriguez, C. M. T., & Campos, L. M. (2016). Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
Byrne G., (2013) Cloud Computing adoption and perceptions of its impact on business-IT alignment in large organisations operating in Ireland. Master Dissertation.
Cao Y., Wang S., Kang L., Gao Y. (2015). A TQCS-based service selection and scheduling strategy in cloud manufacturing. Intelligent Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology. Doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7350-5
Condliffe, J. (2017). Amazon's $150 Million Typo Is a Lightning Rod for a Big Cloud Problem. Retrieved 9 9, 2018, from MIT Technology Review: 603784/amazons-150-million-typo-is-a-lightning-rod-for-a-big-cloud-problem/
Dahouei J. H., Mohammadi N., Vanaki A. S., Jamali M. (2018). Developing Proper Systems for Successful Cloud Computing Implementation Using Fuzzy ARAS Method (Case Study: University of Tehran Faculty of New Science and Technology). Journal of Information Technology Management. Vol. 9, No. 4, PP. 759-786. Doi: 10.22059/jitm.2017.235339.2067
Ding S., Wang Z., Wu D., Olson D.L. (2016). Utilizing customer satisfaction in ranking prediction for personalized cloud service selection. Decision Support Systems.
Elhabbash A., Samreen F., Hadley J., Elkhatib Y. (2018). Cloud Brokerage: A Systematic Survey.
Esposito, C., Ficco, M., Palmieri, F., & Castiglione, A. (2016). Smart Cloud Storage Service Selevtion Based on Fuzzy Logic, Theory of Evidence and Game Theory. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(8), pp. 2348-2362.
Ezenwoke A., Daramola O., Adigun M. (2017). Towards a Fuzzy-oriented Framework for Service Selection in Cloud e-Marketplaces. CLOSER-7th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, 604-609.
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241–253.
Garg S.K., Versteeg S., Buyya R. (2013). A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Generation Computer Systems. pp. 1012-1023. Doi: 10.1016/j.future.2012.06.006
Ghoushchi, S. J., Yousefi, S., & Khazaeili, M. (2019). An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Applied Soft Computing, 81, 105505.
Guo, S.; Zhao, H. Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2017, 121, 23–31. [CrossRef]
Hafezalkotob, A.; Hafezalkotob, A. A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 59, 316–325. [CrossRef]
Hakim Z., (2018). Factors That Contribute to the Resistance to Cloud Computing Adoption by Tech Companies vs. Non-Tech Companies. PhD. Dissertation.
Hioual O., Hemam S.M. (2016). Cloud Services Selection by Load Balancing between Clouds A Hybrid MCDM/Markov Chain Approach. The 12th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. Vol. 1, pp. 289-295.
Hsu, Y. L., Lee, C. H., & Kreng, V. B. (2010). The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 419-425.
Hsu, Y. L., Lee, C. H., & Kreng, V. B. (2010). The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 419-425.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max–min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241–253.
Jagli D., Purohit S., Chandra N.S. (2016). Evaluating Service Customizability of SaaS on the Cloud Computing Environment. International Journal of Computer Applications. Volume 141, No.9.
Jatoth C., Gangadharan J., Fiore U., Buyya R. (2018). SELCLOUD: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for selection of cloud services. Soft Computing. Doi:
Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432-447.
Karim, R., Ding, C., & Miri, A. (2013). An End-To-End QoS Mapping Approach for Cloud Service Selection. proceeding of Ninth World Congress on Services (SERVICES), (pp. 341-348). Santa Clara.
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic – Theory and application. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kumar R.R., Mishra S., Kumar C. (2017). Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated MCDM methods under Fuzzy environment. International Journal of Supercomput. Doi: 10.1007/s11227-017-2039-1
MacGillivray, C., Torchia, M., Kalal, M., Kumar, M., Memorial, R., Siviero, A., et al. (2016, 5 10). Worldwide Internet of Things Forecast Update, 2016–2020., from IDC Research:
Maeser R.K., (2018). A Model-Based Framework for Analyzing Cloud Service Provider Trustworthiness and Predicting Cloud Service Level Agreement Performance. PhD. Dissertation.
Mary N. A., Jayapriya K. (2014). An Extensive Survey on QoS in Cloud computing. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (1), 1-5
Mou, Q.; Xu, Z.; Liao, H. An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Inform. Sciences 2016, 374, 224–239.
Nedev S., (2018). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of Cloud computing and the challenges faced by the business. Master Dissertation.
Noorderhaben, N. (1995). Strategic decision making. UK: Addison-Wesley.
Parameshwaran, R.; Kumar, S.P.; Saravanakumar, K. An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 26, 31–41. [CrossRef]
Rajendran S., (2013). Organizational Challenges in Cloud Adoption and Enablers of Cloud Transition Program. Master Dissertation.
RajKumar K., Balaji S. (2018). A SURVEY ON DISCOVERY AND SELECTION OF CLOUD SERVICES. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 747–751.
Rehman Z., Hussain O.K., Hussain F.K. (2014) Parallel Cloud Service Selection and Ranking Based on QoS History. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 42(5), 820-852.
Rezaei, J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 2015, 53, 49–57. [CrossRef]
Saravanan, K., & Rajaram, M. (2015). An exploratory study of cloud service level agreements—State of the art review, KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst., 9(3), 843-871.
Senarathna I., Wilkin C., Warren M., Yeoh W., Salzman S. (2018). Factors That Influence Adoption of Cloud Computing: An Empirical Study of Australian SMEs.
Tang M., Dai X., Liu J., Chen J. (2016). Towards a trust evaluation middleware for cloud service selection. Future Generation Computer Systems. Doi:
Weins, K. (2018). RightScale 2018 State of the Cloud Report. (RightScale) Retrieved 6 9, 2018, from RightScale:
Whaiduzzaman M., Gani A., Anuar N.B., Shiraz M., Haque M.N., Haque I.T. (2014). Cloud Service Selection Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis. The Scientific World Journal. Doi:
Wu X., (2018). Context-Aware Cloud Service Selection Model for Mobile Cloud Computing Environments. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Doi:
Yarlikas S., (2014) Cloud computing Effectiveness Assessment. PhD. Dissertation.
Yoo S. K., Kim B. K. (2018). A Decision-Making Model for Adopting a Cloud Computing System. Sustainability. Doi: 10.3390/su10082952.