An Intelligent Model of Transparent Governance in Policymaker Organizations with the Approach of Good Governance

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Ph.D. Candidate in Information Technology Management/ Business Intelligence, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Prof., Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

5 Assistant Professor of Social Science, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.


The new paradigm of good governance has an emphasis on international transparency, and this in this study takes into account the actual impacts of organizational intelligence in policymaker organizations. This study primarily aims to design an intelligent model of transparent governance in policymaker organizations with the approach of good governance. The study is a fundamental research in terms of objectives. In the qualitative section, data collection was done through Delphi interview questions, and the statistical population was senior managers, specialists, and policymakers with targeted sampling. In the quantitative part, the population was mid-level managers and organizational intelligence experts. The random sampling method was via the Cochran formula, and 432 individuals were selected. Data gathering tools were interviews and researcher-made survey questionnaires. The content and face validity and Cronbach alpha reliability were employed. The data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics, including factor analysis, regression, and structural equations. Model fit and Friedman test were employed. The findings indicated three dimensions in the proposed model design, including transparency, knowledge creation, and knowledge translation, along with six components, five subcomponents, and 23 indicators. The results suggested that there is a relatively strong and appropriate relationship between organizational intelligence and organizational transparency. Furthermore, sense-making had the highest correlation with organizational transparency. Also, the strongest predictor was the sense-making variable.


Bencherki, N., Basque, J., & Rouleau, L. (2019). A Sensemaking Perspective on Open Strategy. In D. Seidl, R. Whittington, & G. von Krogh (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy (pp. 241–258). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bowman, G. (2016). The Practice of Scenario Planning: An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-organizational Strategizing. British Journal of Management.
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2018). Accountability and Good Governance: Concepts and Issues. In International Development Governance (pp. 269–287). Routledge.
Brunswicker, S., Pujol Priego, L., & Almirall, E. (n.d.). Transparency in policymaking: A complexity view. Elsevier. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from
Cheng, S., Dai, R., Xu, W., & Shi, Y. (2006). Research on data mining and knowledge management and its applications in China’s economic development: Significance and trend. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5(4), 585–596.
Clark, T. D., Jones, M. C., & Armstrong, C. P. (2007). The dynamic structure of management support systems: Theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(3), 579–615.
Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context-Bound Relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134.
Ganguli, D. (2017a). Corporate Governance and Implications. Journal of Industrial Relationship, Corporate Governance & Management Explorer (e ISSN 2456-9461), 1(1), 1–5.
Ganguli, D. (2017b). Corporate Governance and Implications. Journal of Industrial Relationship, Corporate Governance & Management Explorer (e ISSN 2456-9461), 1(1), 1–5.
Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., & Cella, I. (2004). Beyond data warehousing: What’s next in business intelligence? In DOLAP: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (pp. 1–6). ACM.
Gregory, R. (2018). Assessing ‘good governance’: ‘scientific’ measurement and political discourse. Policy Quarterly, 10(1).
Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872–889.
Hong, J. F. L., Snell, R. S., & Mak, C. (2016). Knowledge Assimilation at Foreign Subsidiaries of Japanese MNCs through Political Sensegiving and Sensemaking. Organization Studies, 37(9), 1297–1321.
Huang, J., Newell, S., Huang, J., & Pan, S. L. (2014). Site-shifting as the source of ambidexterity: Empirical insights from the field of ticketing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 29–44.
Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233–237.
Keser, A., & Gökmen, Y. (2018). Governance and Human Development: The Impacts of Governance Indicators on Human Development. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(1), 26–39.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Kuhn, T., & Jackson, M. H. (2008). Accomplishing knowledge: A framework for investigating knowing in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 454–485.
Laoworapong, M., Supattarakul, S., & Swierczek, F. W. W. (2015). Corporate Governance, Board Effectiveness, and Perfor­mance of Thai Listed Firms. AU Journal Management, 13(1), 25–40. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from
Lee, T. H., & Boynton, L. A. (2017). Conceptualizing transparency: Propositions for the integration of situational factors and stakeholders’ perspectives. Public Relations Inquiry, 6(3), 233–251.
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.
Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. In MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems (Vol. 10, pp. 5–12). Routledge.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.
Mr Gagandeep, & Kumar, D. R. S. (2016). Corporate Governance in Banking Sector. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, 20. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from
Newell, S. (2015). Managing knowledge and managing knowledge work: What we know and what the future holds. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 1–17.
Oliver, R. E. (2009). What is transparency? McGraw Hill Professional.
Pakseresht, S., & Afshar, Z. (2017). Assessment of program theory of anti-corruption policies in Iran of ofter revolution. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from
Prashantham, S., Eranova, M., & Couper, C. (2018). Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1), 1–9.
Rawlins, B. (2008). Give the emperor a mirror: toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99.
Reuer, J. J., & Klijn, E. (2018). Governance of Hybrid Organizations. Annals of Corporate Governance, 3(1), 1–81.
Rouhani, S., Ashrafi, A., Zare Ravasan, A., & Afshari, S. (2016). The impact model of business intelligence on decision support and organizational benefits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1).
Sepehrnia, R., Alborzi, M., Kermanshah, A., & Azar, A. (2019). Creative Pattern of Transparency with an Emphasis on Good Governance for Policymaker Organizations in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 9(2), 77–102.
Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organizational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339–367.
Sudhir, K., & Talukdar, D. (2015). The “Peter Pan Syndrome” in Emerging Markets: The Productivity-Transparency Trade-off in IT Adoption. Marketing Science, 34(4), 500–521.
Tao, Y., & Tombros, A. (2017). How collaborators make sense of tasks together: A comparative analysis of collaborative sensemaking behavior in collaborative information-seeking tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 609–622.
Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2017). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly.