Social Campaigns on Online Platforms as a New Form of Public Sphere in Digital Era: A Critical Review

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Information Systems, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor of Information Systems, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Nowadays with the ever-increasing growth in social media platforms and the creation of different forms of online activism, the word known as “Campaign” has become a familiar and useful term in people’s everyday lives. Campaigns with all kinds of social aims especially using Hashtags are run on social media platforms by individuals, charities, NGOs, governments, municipalities and brand companies and with peoples' participation and value co-creation, appropriate results are achieved and the desired changes are made in people’s attitudes and the behavior of individuals, businesses, or governments. Therefore, there seems to be a new form of a virtual public sphere where there is action, dialog and social mobilization, which leads to the formation of public opinion and social change in the digital era. In this paper, using a critical review method, we are going to investigate a public sphere's literature and study its core features (1. access, 2. dialog, 3. action, and 4. public opinion) in digital campaigns and online platforms. Then, in the last part, we are going to map those in a real case study in order to further clarify the arguments and show how social campaigns on online platforms contribute to the formation of a public sphere in the digital era.

Keywords

References

Bogunia-Borowska, M. (2004). Advertising as the Creation of Social Reality. Jagiellonian University, Krakow.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
Crosbie, V. (2002). What is new media? Retrieved June 13, 2019 from http://www.sociology.org.uk/as4mm3a.doc
Diamond, L., & Plattner, M.F. (2012), Liberation Technology: Social Media and the Struggle for Democracy, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Etter, M. (2014). Broadcasting, reacting, engaging – three strategies for csr communication in Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 18(4), 322-342.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere. A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.
Fung, A., Russon, H., Shkabatur, G., & Shkabatur, J. (2013). Six Models for the Internet + Politics. International Studies Review, 15(1), 30-47.
Grant, M. J., & Booth A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.
Guidry, J. P. D., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Moving social marketing beyond personal change to social change: Strategically using Twitter to mobilize supporters into vocal advocates, Journal of Social Marketing, 4(3).
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Trans. Burger, T. with Lawrence, F., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Han  B. C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. Verso Futures.
Hernik, J., & Dziadas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of social campaigns in the eyes of their recievers, on campaigns promoting safe driving example. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 4(24).
Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S.C. (2009) Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
Hsiao, Y. (2015). Social media and collective action participation: A socio-psychological investigation. Master Dissertation, University of Washington.
Jurietti, E., Mandelli, A., & Fudurić, M. (2017). How do virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value? A case study of the Unilever Sustainable Living Lab. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Wiley Online Library.
Kaiser, J., Fähnrich, B., Rhomberg, M., & Filzmaier, P. (2017). What happened to the public sphere? the networked public sphere and public opinion formation. Springer International Publishing.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 29-68.
Khaniki, H., & Alvandi, P. (2010). Citizen media and counter public sphere (Case study of five citizen journalism website in Iran). Journal of Social Science, 51.
Korschun, D., & Du, S. (2013). How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1494–1504.
Kowalik S., & Sek H. (1999). Psychological context of social problems. Humaniora Foundation, Poznan.
Laucuka, A. (2018).  Communicative functions of hashtags. Economics and Culture, 15(1).
Lefebvre R. C. (2012). Transformative social marketing: co-creating the social marketing discipline and brand. Journal of Social Marketing, 2(2).
MacKinnon, R. (2008). Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China. Public Choice, 134, 31-46.
Mahdizadeh, M. (2004). Internet and public sphere. Media, 59, 111-131.
Mayer, P. (2009). Guidelines for writing a review article. Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center.
Mayer-Schoenberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray Publishers.
Morozov E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom / how not to liberate the world. London: Penguin Books.
Myers, M. (2013). Is there a link between digital media and good governance? What the academics say. A Report to the Center for International Media Assistance.
O’Brien, R. (1999). Civil society: the public sphere and the Internet. Retrieved June 20, 2019 from http//:www.web.net.
Pedram, M. (2009). Public Sphere: an Alternative Narrative of Politics (Arnett and Habermas Theories). Foundational Studies Institute, Yadavaran Publisher.
Poster, M. (1995). The second media age. Wiley.
Roncha A., & Radclyffe-Thomas N. (2016). How Toms’s one day without shoes campaign brings stakeholders together and co-creates value for the brand using Instagram as a platform. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(3).
Sandoval-Almazan, R. & Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2014). Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 365–378.
Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: How change happens when people come together. London: Penguin.
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: technology, the public sphere and political change, foreign affairs.
Sorensen, A. (2015). Social media for social good: value creation in social media based cause brand communities. PhD Dissertation, School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Queensland University of Technology.
Tapscott, D., & Williams A.D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin Group.
Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London, Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Wanjiru, K.C., (2016). Social media for social good: analyzing the role of social media in mobilizing for social causes. Master Dissertation, Communication Studies, University of Nairobi.
Journal of Information Technology Management
Volume 11, Issue 3
2019
Pages 81-95

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics