روشندل اربطانی, طاهر, کاظمی, حسین, حاج اسماعیلی, فهیمه. (1395). مدلسازی عوامل اثرگذار بر دسترسی فیزیکی به رایانه و اینترنت با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات, 8(3), 451-566. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2016.58395
طاهر روشندل اربطانی; حسین کاظمی; فهیمه حاج اسماعیلی. "مدلسازی عوامل اثرگذار بر دسترسی فیزیکی به رایانه و اینترنت با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی". فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات, 8, 3, 1395, 451-566. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2016.58395
روشندل اربطانی, طاهر, کاظمی, حسین, حاج اسماعیلی, فهیمه. (1395). 'مدلسازی عوامل اثرگذار بر دسترسی فیزیکی به رایانه و اینترنت با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی', فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات, 8(3), pp. 451-566. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2016.58395
روشندل اربطانی, طاهر, کاظمی, حسین, حاج اسماعیلی, فهیمه. مدلسازی عوامل اثرگذار بر دسترسی فیزیکی به رایانه و اینترنت با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات, 1395; 8(3): 451-566. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2016.58395
مدلسازی عوامل اثرگذار بر دسترسی فیزیکی به رایانه و اینترنت با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی
1دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ علوم اداری واقتصاد، دانشگاه ولی عصر(عج)، رفسنجان، ایران
3کارشناسارشد مدیریت دولتی ـ سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی، دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه ولی عصر(عج)، رفسنجان، ایران
چکیده
امروزه جامعۀ جهانی با چالش جدیدی به نام شکاف دیجیتالی روبهروست که این چالش به نابرابری در دسترسی و استفاده از محصولات و خدمات فناوری‌‌های اطلاعاتی و ارتباطی بین افراد و جوامع منجر می‌شود. اهمیت پدیدۀ شکاف دیجیتالی بهدلیل تأثیر سیاسی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی آن بر زندگی روزمرۀ افراد و وضعیت داخلی و بینالمللی کشور است. این پژوهش با هدف کاربردی، پس از شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر دسترسی افراد به رایانه و اینترنت در سطح شهروندان رفسنجان با استفاده از داده‌های 501 پرسشنامۀ پاسخ داده شده، به مدلسازی این عوامل با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی ـ فازی تطبیقی پرداخته است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سواد و مهارت دیجیتالی، عامل اقتصادی و دسترسی انگیزشی نسبت به سایر عوامل، بیشترین تأثیر را بر دسترسی فیزیکی افراد به رایانه و اینترنت دارد. از مقایسۀ نتایج پژوهش با نتایج روش معادلات ساختاری، مشخص شد هر دو نتیجه با یکدیگر همخوانی دارند.
1Associate Prof., Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Administrative Science and Economics, Vali-e-asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran
3MSc, Public Administration-Information Systems, Faculty of Administrative Science and Economics, Vali-e-asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran
چکیده [English]
Today, the global community is facing with a new challenge called digital divide which leads to inequality in access to and use of information and communication technology products and services among individuals and communities. The importance of Digital Dived is because of its political, economic, social and cultural impacts on the daily lives of individuals and a country's domestic and international situation. Thus, this applied article aimed to identify the effective factors in individuals' access to computers and Internet using the data obtained from 501 questionnaires distributed among citizens of Rafsanjan. Then, these factors were modeled using adaptive fuzzy neural networks. The results showed that digital literacy and skills, economic factor, and motivational access had the highest impacts on physical access to computers and the Internet rather than other factors. The comparison of the results with outcomes of structural equation modeling, indicated that both were compatible with each other
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Adaptive Fuzzy Neural Networks, Digital Divide/Gap, Information and Communication Technology, Physical Access
مراجع
Abu-Shanab, E. & Al-Jamal, N. (2015). Exploring the Gender Digital Divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1): 91-113.
Alvani, S. M., Memarzadeh Tehran, Gh. R., Kazemi, H. (2013). Exploring the Traits and Behaviors of Spiritual Leaders by Using Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy Systems. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 11(3): 95-120. (in Persian(
Andonova, V. (2006). Mobile phones, the internet and the institutional environment. Telecommun. Policy, 30(1): 29-45.
Atherton, P. (1977). Handbook for Information Systems and Services. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Bansode, S. & Patil, S. (2011). Bridging digital divide in India: Some initiatives. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(1): 58-68.
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Personality and Social Psyc-hology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies; a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 47(2): 218−259.
Borgida, E., Sullivan, J., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M., Riedel, E. & Gangl, A. (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: the role of community electronic networks. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1): 125-141.
Bouckaert, J., van Dijk, T. & Verboven, F. (2010). Access regulation, competition, and broadband penetration: an international study. Telecommunications Policy, 34 (11): 661-671.
Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2006). The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers.
Corrocher, N. & Ordanini, A. (2002). Measuring the digital divide: a framework for the analysis of cross-country differences. Journal of Information Tecnhology, 17(1): 9-19.
Crenshaw, E.M. & Robison, K.K. (2006). Globalization and the digital divide: the roles of structural conduciveness and global connection in internet diffusion. Social Science Quarterly, 87(1): 190-207.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8): 982-1003.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C. & Shafer, S. (2004). In: Neckerman Kathryn, editor. Digital inequality: from unequal access to differentiated use in social inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 355-400.
Dugdale, A., Daly, A., Papandrea, F. & Maley, M. (2005). Accessinge-government: challenges for citizens and organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1): 109-118.
Erumban, A. A., & De Jong, S. B. (2006). Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of Culture?. Journal of World Business, 41(4), 302-314.
Ferro, E., Helbig, C. N. & Gil-Garcia, J. R. ( 2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1): 3-10.
Fuchs, C. (2009). The role of income inequality in a multivariate cross-national analysis of the digital divide. Social Science Computer, 27(1): 41-58.
Fuchs, C. & Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25 (2): 99-116.
Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S. & Horsburgh, S. ( 2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The Demand-side of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2): 177-186.
Ghasemi, H. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling in Social Researches using Amos Graphics. Tehran: Sociologists. (in Persian(
Ghasemi, A. R. & Asgharizadeh, E. (2014). Presenting a Hybrid ANN-MADM Method to Define Excellence Level of Iranian Petrochemical Companies. Journal of Information Technology Management, 6(2): 267-284. (in Persian(
Hanafizadeh, M. R., Saghaei, A. & Hanafizadeh, P. (2009). An index for cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access. Telecommunications Policy, 33(7): 385-405.
Hariri, N. & Yari Firuzabadi, Y.H. (2009). Studying the status of information technology infrastructure in central libraries of islamic azad university, fifth region. Journal of epistemology (library and information science and information technology). 2(5): 45-57.(in Persian(
Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making.Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715-736.
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P. & Schlosser, A. E. (2000). The evolution of the digital divide: How gaps in internet access may impact electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3).
Horrigan, J. (2009). Home broadband adoption 2009. Washington, D. C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
ITU (2009). Measuring the Information Society. The ICT Development Index. http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ict/publications/idi/material/2009/MIS2009_w5.pdf.
ITU (2015). ICT Facts & Figures. The world in 2015. Itu 150 Años (1865 - 2015), 6. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICT FactsFigures2015.pdf.
James, J. (2003). Bridging the global digital divide. Northampton: EdwardElgar.
James, J. (2007). From origin to implications: key aspects in the debate over the digital divide. Journal of Information Tecnhology, 22(3): 284-295.
Jang, J. R. (1993). ANFIS: Adap tive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System. Ieee Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3): 665–685.
Jung, J.Y., Qiu, J.L. & Kim Y.C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: beyond the Divide. Communication Research, 28(4): 507-535.
Kyriakidou,V., Michalakelis, C. & Sphicopoulos, T. (2011). Digital divi-de gap convergence in Europe.Technology in Society, 33(3): 265-270.
Liu, M. & San, G. (2006). Social learning and digital divides: A case study of Internet technology diffusion. Kyklos, 59(2): 307-321.
Mohammad Ghaffari, H., Alizadeh Gharehbagh, R. & Salmani, U. (2013). Assessing the Impact of Development on the Demand for ICT Services and ICT Infrastructure in Iran: a Study of Inter - Provincial with Panel Data Approach. Journal of Information Technology Management, 5(3): 147-168. (in Persian)
Mohtarami, A., khodadad Hosseini, S. H. & Elahi, Sh. (2014). Investigation of the factors affecting IT diffusion in organizations. Journal of Technology Development Management, 1(3): 97-122. (in Persian(
OECD (2009). Organization for economic, co-operation and development. Available in: www.oecd.org.
Pan, C. C., Sivo, S. & Brophy, J. (2003). Students’ attitude in a web-enhanced hybrid course: a structural equation modeling inquiry. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41(2): 181-194.
Park, S.R., Choi, D.Y. & Hong, P. (2015). Club convergence and factors of digital divide across countries, Technol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.011.
Partridge, H. (2005). Establishing the human dimension of the digital divide. In: Quigley E, editor. Information security and ethics: social and organizational issues. Hersey, US: RM Press, 23-47.
Pourkazemi, M, H. & Asadi, M. B. (2010). Forecasting of Crude Oil Prices Using Neural Networks and OECD Inventories. Journal of Economic Research, 44(3): 25-46.(in Persian(
Prieger, J.E. & Hub, W.M. (2008). The broadband digital divide and the nexus of race, competition, and quality. Information Economics and Policy, 20(2): 150-167.
Puspitasari, L. & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2): 472-483.
Raeesi Vanani, I. & Ganjalikhan Hakemi, F. (2015). Designing an Adaptive Nuero-Fuzzy Inference System for Evaluating the Business Intelligence System Implementation in Software Industry. Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(1): 85-104. (in Persian(
Rye, S. A. (2008). Exploring the gap of the digital divide: Conditions of connectivity and higher education participation. GeoJournal, 71(2-3): 171–184.
Roshandel Arbatani, T., Kazemi, H. & Haj Esmaeili, F. (2015). Determinants of the digital divide (Case study: Rafsanjan citizens). Journal of Public Administration, 6(4): 681-703. (in Persian(
Scadias, G. (2002). Monitoring the Digital Divide, an ORBICOM-CIDA project. National Research Council of Canada.
Sheikh Shoaei, F. & Olomi, T. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of information technology by librarians Technical School University in Tehran. Library and Information Science. 10(3): 18-35. (in Persian(
Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T. & Connolly, R. (2011). The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information System, 20(3): 308-328.
Toloie Eshlaghi, A. & Haghdoust, Sh. (2007). Stock price prediction modelling using neural networks and comparison with mathematical prediction methods. Journal of Economic Research, 7(2): 237-252.(in Persian(
Van Deursen, A. & van Dijk, J. (2015). New Media and the Digital Divide. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 16(2): 787-792.
Van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks,London: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5): 221-235.
Van Dijk, J. (2008). The Digital Divide in Europe. The Handbook of Internet Politics, London and New York: Routledge.
Vicente, M.R. & Lopez, A.J. (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the European Union-15. Information & Management. 43(6): 756-766.
Vosough, M., Taghavi Fard, M. T. & Alborzi, M. (2015). Bank card fraud detection using artificial neural network. Journal of Information Technology Management, 6(4): 721-746. (in Persian(
Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7(7).
Wilson, E.J. ( 2006). The Information Revolution and Developing Countries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T. & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(2): 28-55.
ابتدای صفحه