The Investigation of E-Business Trends by Using Social Network Analysis Technique during 1980 to 2015

Document Type : Research Paper


MSc. Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


In today’s world, the global nature of business and advances in information and communication technology, forced organizations to use emerging technologies to maintain themselves competitive. In recent years, electronic business (e-learning) has been adopted by many organizations. Thereby companies can improve their operational efficiency, profitability and competitive position. This research tried by using burst detection algorithm in scientometrics, to examine all keywords, titles, premier authors, universities, countries as well as co-authors network in the field of e-business . Hence, all relevant articles in the Web of Science database - as a reference for this study- during 1980 to 2015 have been investigated. In this regard, 4697 articles extracted and burst detection algorithm was used to analyze


Main Subjects

Barabâsi, A.L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A. & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 311(3): 590-614.
Beheshti, H. M. & Salehi-Sangari, E. (2007). The benefits of e-business adoption: an empirical study of Swedish SMEs. Service business, 1(3): 233-245.
Börner, K. (2012). Visualization: Picturing science. Nature, 487(7408): 430-431.
Chang, H.L. (2010). A roadmap to adopting emerging technology in e-business: an empirical study. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 8(2): 103-130.
Chen, Y., Fang, S. & Börner, K. (2011). Mapping the development of scientometrics: 2002–2008. Journal of Library Science in China, 3: 131-146.
Coombes, P. H. & Nicholson, J. D. (2013). Business models and their relationship with marketing: A systematic literature review. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5): 656-664.
Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver BC Canada: Empirical Press.
Hamdaqa, M., Tahvildari, L., LaChapelle, N. & Campbell, B. (2014). Cultural scene detection using reverse Louvain optimization. Science of Computer Programming, 95: 44-72.
Hook, P. A. & Börner, K. (2005). Educational knowledge domain visualizations: tools to navigate, understand, and internalize the structure of scholarly knowledge and expertise. New directions in cognitive information retrieval. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4014-8_10. 
Hsu-Hao, T. & Chiang, J. K. (2010). E-commerce literature trend forecasting: A study of bibliometric methodology. Paper presented at the New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on. 11-13 May 2010.
Iizuka, K., Iizuka, Y. & Suematsu, C. (2013). E-business process modeling issues: From the viewpoint of inter-organizational process efficiency and information sharing. Procedia Computer Science, 22: 820-827.
Janita, I. & Chong, W. K. (2013). Barriers of b2b e-business adoption in Indonesian SMEs: A Literature Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 17: 571-578.
Jinlong, B. & Qianjin, Z. (2013). Research Focuses and Frontiers of Consumer Satisfaction of Electronic Commerce: Based on Knowledge Map. WHICEB 2013 Proceedings. Paper 92. Available in: /92.
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4): 373-397.
Kostoff, R. N. & Schaller, R. R. (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineening Management, 48(2): 132-143.
Lefebvre, L.A., Lefebvre, É., Elia, E. & Boeck, H. (2005). Exploring B-to-B e-commerce adoption trajectories in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 25(12): 1443-1456.
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Universal-Publishers.
Li, Y., Fu, S. S., Chung, J.-Y. & Chao, K.M. (2008). Emerging technologies for e-business engineering. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 6(1): 1-3.
Ma, Z. (2005). From theoretical essentials to paradigms: the development path of electronic commerce research. International journal of electronic business, 3(5): 491-507.
Mahendra, S. & Yoshiki, M. (2015). A Bibliometric Analysis on Online Shopping. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 5(2): 55-61.
Mardani, A. & Mardani, E. (2016). Social Network Analysis of the Co-authorship Network in the Scientific Articles of Information Systems. Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(4): 909-930. (in Persian)
McGrath, C., Blythe, J. & Krackhardt, D. (1997). The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs. Social Networks, 19(3): 223-242.
Nascimento, M. A., Sander, J. & Pound, J. (2003). Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph. ACM Sigmod record, 32(3): 8-10.
Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical review E, 64(1): 016131-1/ 016131-8.
Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of information Science, 28(6): 441-453.
Pinheiro, C. A. R. (2011). Social network analysis in telecommunications.Vol. 37. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-470-64754-7.
Poon, S. & Swatman, P. M. (1998). A combined-method study of small business Internet commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(3): 31-46.
Rezaeenour, J., Lesani, R., Zakizadeh, A. & Safamajid, G. (2014). Evaluating Authorship Collaboration Networks in the Field of Information Technology Using Social Netwowk Techniques. Journal of Information Technology Management, 6(2): 229-250. (in Persian)
Rodrigues, S., Van Eck, N., Waltman, L. & Jansen, F. (2014). Mapping patient safety: a large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques. BMJ open, 4(3): e004468.
Rodriguez, M. A. & Pepe, A. (2008). On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3): 195-201.
Shakir, M., Smith, G. & Gulee, E. (2007). E-procurement: reaching out to small and medium businesses. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(4): 225-238.
Singh, M. & Byrne, J. (2005). Performance evaluation of e-business in Australia. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 8(1): 71-80.
Storey, V. & Tao, Y. Y. (2015). A Recommender System for Two-sided Markets: Understanding Customers Sentiment in Social Networks. Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico.
Swar, B. & Khan, G. F. (2014). Mapping ICT knowledge infrastructure in South Asia. Scientometrics, 99(1): 117-137.
Team, S. (2009). Science of science (Sci2) tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies.
Tsai, H.-H. (2015). The research trends forecasted by bibliometric methodology: a case study in e-commerce from 1996 to July 2015. Scientometrics, 105(2): 1079-1089.
Turban, E., Lee, J., King, D. & Chung, H. M. (2000). Electronic commerce: a managerial perspective. Vol. 1. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2): 523-538.
Vidgen, R., Henneberg, S. & Naudé, P. (2007). What sort of community is the European Conference on Information Systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(1): 5-19.
Wang, C.C. & Chen, C.C. (2010). Electronic commerce research in latest decade: A literature review. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 1(1): 1-14.
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Vol. 8. Cambridge university press.
Wellman, B. (2008). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 37(3): 221-222.
Zhao, J., Wang, S. & Huang, W. V. (2008). A study of B2B e-market in China: E-commerce process perspective. Information & Management, 45(4): 242-248.