Review the Position of the Ethics paradigm in Code of Ethics by Meta-synthesis –Observed Case (Association for Computing Machinery )

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

All researches and documents have a philosophical basis and since paradigm refers to the system of thinking, it can be basis for research patterns. Despite of the various discussions on information system paradigms and code of ethics , non of them deal with paradigm of code of ethics. Due to this gap the aim of this research is explaining the position of ethics paradigm in organizations code of ethics which work in information systems. In this research, features of ethics in paradigms is demonstrated in by using meta-synthesis. Extracted information shows organizational code of ethics which active in information system fields and totally specifies paradigms of each provision of Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Totally our surveys shows that modern and post-modern are dominant paradigm of code of ethics which represent the dominance of applied ethics, ethical responsibility, Resistance oriented, critical training, domination struggles training and democratic training in ACM code of ethics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

AAT. (2014). Code of Professional Ethics. uk: AAT. http://www.ncra.org/Codeof ProfessionalEthics.
Alvani, M., Rahmati, M. (2008). Code of Ethics for the editing process. Quarterly Journal of Management culture, 5(15): 43-70. (in Persian)
Anderson, R. E., Johnson, D.G., Gotterbarn, D. & Perrolle, J. (1993). Using the New ACM Code of Ethics in Decision Making, Communications of the ACM, 36 (2): 98-107.
Atrak, H. (2014). Kantian idealism duty. Qom: Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture. (in Persian)
Azimi, H., Nor-Ali Dokht, H. & Jalilvan, A. (2012). Corporate ethics and ethical decision making in organizations. Third National Conference on the theme of his honor Applied Ethics: Zanjan. (in Persian)
Bowen, S. (2002). Elite executives in issues management: The role of ethical paradigms in decision making. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(4): 270-283.
Chalmers, A. (2012). Elements of Science-Introduction to Scientology philosophical schools. Samt: Tehran. (in Persian)
Chenail, R. (2011). Learning to Appraise the Quality of Qualitative Research Articles: A Contextualized Learning Object for Constructing Knowledge. The Qualitative Report, 1(9): 49-61.
Eri, T., Bondas, T., Gross, M., Janssen, P. & Green, J. (2014). A balancing act in an unknown territory: A metasynthesis of first-time mothers' experiences in early labour. Midwifery, 31(3): 58-67.
Green, B. (2012). Applying Feminist Ethics of Care to Nursing Practice. Journal of Nursing and Care, 1(3): 1-4.
Joan, R. (2010). Information Ethics.Online  Dictionary for Library and Information Science. http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_A.aspx.
Kemal, S. (1999). Aesthetic Licence: Foucaults Modernism and Kant Postmodernism. Internation Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7 (3): 281-303.
Kuhn, T. (1991). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
Manian, A. & Ronaghi, M. (2014). Ethic in Information System, In the process of publishing. (in Persian)
Nathas, N. (2005). Feminist Ethics without Feminist Ethical Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30 (supplement): 213-225.
Noblit, G. & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
Poya, A. & Bromand, E. (2012). Professional Ethics in Production Process. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 7(3): 48-58.
(in Persian)
Ramim, M. (2011). Proposed Organizational Ethical Commitment Paradigm for the Use of ICTs in Business Organizations. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference. Jun 18–23. Novi Sad, Serbia.
Sajadi, S. & Ali Abadi, A. (2010). Explain the theory of ethics in modern philosophy (Kant) and postmodern (Foucault) and its implications for moral education, Comparative Review. Taliman and Tarbiat: Tehran. 24(1): 137-167.
Salasi, M. (2003). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Elmi Publishing: Tehran.
(in Persian)
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on Qualitative Methods Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4): 365-371.
Seals, G. (2013). An Ethics Paradigm for the Service Organization. American International Journal of Social Science, 2(3): 1-9.
Shirvani, A. (2008). Meta-ethics. Kanoon Andishe Javan: Tehran. (in Persian)
Spring, J. (2011). On the Rescuing of Rights in Feminist Ethics: A Critical Assessmentof Virginia Held's Transformative Strategy. Praxis, 3(1): 66-83.
Stahl, B.C. (2005). A CRritical View of The Ethical Nature of Interpretive Research: Paul Ric and the other. 13th  European Conferance of Information System. Regensburg.
Stern, P. N. & Harris, C. C. (1985). Women's health and the self-care paradox: a model to guide self-care readiness. Health Care for Women International, 6(1): 151-163.
Walsh, D. & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2): 204-211.
 
Journal of Information Technology Management
Volume 7, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
October 2015
Pages 889-908

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics