Investigating the Effect of New Communication and Information Technologies on Organizational Structure and Firm Performance in Service Industry: a Survey of Consultant Engineering Firms

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Prof., Dep. of Management, Islamic Azad University, Oloom Tahghighat, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Prof., Dep of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabei University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master, MBA, Dep. of Management, University of Tehran, Kish Campus, Iran


This study aims to investigate the current and desired situation of information and communication technologies (ICT), organizational structure and firm performance in Consultant Engineering Firms. To do so, a descriptive-exploratory study was performed among 252 managers and experts of consultant engineering firms in Tehran. A cluster sampling approach was used bya self-administrated questionnaire. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s coefficient. Using one sample t-test, paired sample t-test and regression analysis, results indicated that 1) current and desired situation of ICT, organizational structure and firm performance are acceptable, 2) there is significant difference between current and desired situation of ICT, organizational structure and firm performance, 3) ICT has a positive and significant effect on organizational structure and firm performance

سرمد، ز.؛ بازرگان، ع. و حجازی، الف. (1386)، روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات آگه.
Baninajarian, N., Abdullah, Z. and Bolong, J. (2011). The role of email in improving task performance among the executives in Malaysia, Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(4): 52-62.
Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H., Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6 (1): 3-23.
Bezweek, S. & Egbu, C. (2010). The Impact of Information Technology to Facilitate Communication Collaboration in Libyan Public Organisations, in: 'CIB World Congress 2010', school of built environment, the university of salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK. Conference details: CIB World Congress, Building A Better World, 10-13 May, The Lowry, Salford Quays, United Kingdom.
Bloom, N., Sadun, R. and van Reenen, J. (2010). Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle.
Campbell, J.P., Bownas, D.A., Peterson, N.G. (1974). The measurement of organizational effectiveness: a review of the relevant research and opinion”, Report Final Technical Report, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA.
Daft, L. R. (2004). Organization Theory and Design, Thomson South-Western, 8th edition.
Duh, R., Chow, C., Chen, H. (2006). Strategy, IT applications for planning and control, and firm performance: the impact of impediments to IT implementation, Information & Management, 43 (8): 939-49.
Grant, A. E. and Meadows, J.H. (2008), Communication Technology Update and Fundamentals. 11th Edition, Focal Press, USA.
Grönroos, C. (2000). Relationship Marketing: Interaction, Dialogue and Value. Revista Europea de Direccióny Economía de la Empresa, 9 (3): 13-24.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatman, R.L. Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data, Analysis with Reading. 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 47-71.
Jacobides, M.G., Croson, D.C. (2001). Information policy: shaping the value of agency relationships, Academy of Management Review, 26 (2): 202-23.
Jean, R. J. (2007). The ambiguous relationship of ICT and organizational performance: a literature review. Critical perspectives on international business, 3 (4): 306 – 321.
Jean, R., Sinkovics, R., Kim, D. (2008). Information technology and organizational performance within international business to business relationships: a review and an integrated conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 25(5): 563-83.
Kim, S.M., Mahoney, J.T. (2006). Mutual commitment to support exchange: relation-specific it system as a substitute for managerial hierarchy, Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 401-23.
Li, M. Ye, L.R. (1999). Information technology and firm performance: linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management, 35(1): 43-51.
Loveman, G.W. (1994). An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies, in Allen, T.J. and Scott Morton, M.S. (Eds), Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Lucas, H. C. (1996). The T-form Organization; using technology to design organizations for 21st century, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (3):233-249.
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Pande, A., Raman, R., Srivatsan, V. (2006). Recapturing your supply chain data, McKinsey Quarterly, 8 (4): 16-21.
Ragowsky, A., Ahituv, N. Neumann, S. (1996). Identifying the value and importance of an information system application. Information & Management, 31(2): 89-102.
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R. Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2): 225-46.
Sanders, N.R. (2005). IT alignment in supply chain relationships: a study of supplier benefits. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(2):4-13.
Spanos, Y., Prastacos, G. P. and Poulymenakou, A. (2002). The relationship between information and communication technologies adoption and management, Information & Management, 39 (8): 659-675.
Stank, T.P., Daugherty, P.J. Gustin, G.M. (1994). Organizational structure: influence on logistics integration, costs, and information system performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 5(2):41-52.
Stewart, R.A. (2007), IT enhanced project information management in construction: pathways to improved performance and strategic competitiveness, Automation in Construction, 16(4): 511-17.
Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C. Gefen, D. (2004), Validation guidelines for IS positivist research, Communications of the AIS, 13: 380-427.