The Role of Parental Mediation in the Relationship between Adolescents’ Use of Social Media and Family Relationships in Saudi Arabia

Document Type : Proceedings of The 6'th International Conference on Communication Management and Information Technology (ICCMIT'20)

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK,

2 Reader in Forensic Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK,

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the impact of parenting mediation strategies on family relationships and social media use among Saudi adolescents. To achieve the aim, a quantitative research design was used, involving questionnaires with data collected from 393 Saudi students aged 13-18 years. Pearson correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed. The key findings of this study showed that Snapchat and Instagram were the most popular social media sites among Saudi adolescents, and parenting mediation strategies were affected by family relationships. Just over a third of participants (35.62%) reported that they spent 3-5 hours per day on social media with another 30.79% spending more than 6 hours per day on social media. Family relationships were found to strongly predict the social integration and social media addiction. The data showed a significant negative correlation between excessive use of social media and two components of family relationships (cohesion and expressiveness). Moreover, the results suggest that lower levels of family expressiveness and higher levels of family conflict were associated with social media addiction. The parenting mediation strategies were shown to predict the cohesiveness and expressiveness of family relationships. Finally, technical and monitoring parenting mediation strategies were found significant associated with the social media use and the family relationships. These results contribute to formulating guidelines for parents and policymakers in developing countries such as Saudi Arabia to protect their children from the social media risks.

Keywords

References

Age Restrictions on Social Media Services (n.d.) UK Safer Internet Centre wins award. Age Restrictions on Social Media Services. Retrieved February 23, 2019, from https://www.saferinternet.org.uk/blog/age-restrictions-social-media-services.
Ali, S., Harbi, H. A. A., & Rahman, S. R. (2018). Relationship between Use of Social Media and Depression among Female Teenagers in Buraidah, AlQassim, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Child and Adolescent Behavior, 06(03). doi: 10.4172/2375-4494.1000374
Anderson, M. and Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media, & technology 2018. Pew Research Centre. Retrieved January 23, 2020 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.
Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 501–517. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.pr0.110.2.501-517
Benrazavi, R., Teimouri, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Utility of Parental Mediation Model on Youth’s Problematic Online Gaming. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(6), 712–727. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9561-2
Bersamin, M., Todd, M., Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., & Walker, S. (2008). Parenting Practices and Adolescent Sexual Behavior: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 97–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00464.x
Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2005). Parental Mediation of Undesired Advertising Effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 153–165. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_1
Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships online intimacies and networked friendship. London: Palgrave.
Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2018). Reducing Harm From Media: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173–193. doi: 10.1177/1077699018754908
Chng, G. S., Li, D., Liau, A. K., & Khoo, A. (2015). Moderating Effects of the Family Environment for Parental Mediation and Pathological Internet Use in Youths. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(1), 30–36. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0368
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
Daud, A., Omar, S. Z., Hassan, M. S., Bolong, J., & Teimouri, M. (2014). Parental Mediation of children’s positive use of the Internet . Life Science Journal, 11(8), 360–369.
Dürager, A. and Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? London: EU Kids Online.
Dürager, A. and Sonck, N. (2014). Testing the reliability of scales on parental internet mediation. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.
Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 486–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Psychological issues: identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press.
Fok, C. C. T., Allen, J. A., Henry, D. undefined, & Team, P. undefined. (2014). The Brief Family Relationship Scale: a brief measure of the relationship dimension in family functioning. Assessment, 21(1), 67–72. doi: 10.1177/1073191111425856
Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2007). Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
Hill, N. E. (1995). The Relationship Between Family Environment and Parenting Style: A Preliminary Study of African American Families. Journal of Black Psychology, 21(4), 408–423. doi: 10.1177/00957984950214007
Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B. D. (2013). Development and Validation of the Social Media Use Integration Scale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 38–50. doi: 10.1037/e638312012-001
Khurana, A., Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., & Romer, D. (2015). The Protective Effects of Parental Monitoring and Internet Restriction on Adolescents’ Risk of Online Harassment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1039–1047. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0242-4
Lee, S.-J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society, 15(4), 466–481. doi: 10.1177/1461444812452412
Lee, S.-J., & Chae, Y.-G. (2007). Childrens Internet Use in a Family Context: Influence on Family Relationships and Parental Mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640–644. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9975
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309–329. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342697
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental Mediation of Childrens Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. doi: 10.1080/08838150802437396
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. and Olafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries (EU Kids Online, Deliverable D4). London, UK: EU Kids Online Network.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. and Ólafsson, K. (2011). The 2010 EU kids online survey. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks for Children Online: The Role of Digital Skills in Emerging Strategies of Parental Mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12277
Lwin, M., Stanaland, A., & Miyazaki, A. (2008). Protecting childrens privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004
Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental Mediation, Online Activities, and Cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387–393. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003). The Exposure Of Youth To Unwanted Sexual Material On The Internet. Youth & Society, 34(3), 330–358. doi: 10.1177/0044118x02250123
Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1980). Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9(3), 271–280. doi: 10.1007/bf02088471
Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and Explaining the Relationship Between Parental Mediation and Childrens Aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124–143. doi: 10.1177/009365099026002002
Nielsen, P., Favez, N., Liddle, H., & Rigter, H. (2019). Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online screen use: A systematic literature review. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 8(4), 649–663. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.61
Okeeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0054
Richards, D., Caldwell, P. H., & Go, H. (2015). Impact of social media on the health of children and young people. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 51(12), 1152–1157. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13023
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025
Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research , 3(7),749-752.
Shin, W., & Ismail, N. (2014). Exploring the Role of Parents and Peers in Young Adolescents Risk Taking on Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(9), 578–583. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0095
Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and Social Participation: Contrasting Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 00–00. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00226.x
Soh, P. C.-H., Charlton, J. P., & Chew, K.-W. (2014). The influence of parental and peer attachment on Internet usage motives and addiction. First Monday, 19(7). doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i7.5099
Sonck, N., Nikken, P. and de Haan, J. (2013). Determinants of internet mediation. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 96–113.
Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Emmery, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A Factorial Validation of Parental Mediation Strategies with Regard to Internet Use. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 93–111. doi: 10.5334/pb.372
Tariq, W., Mehboob, M., Khan, M. and Ullah, F. (2012). The impact of social media and social networks on education and students of Pakistan. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 9(3), 407–412.
UNICEF. (2011). The State of the World's Children 2011: Adolescence – An Age of Opportunity. (2011, March 4). Retrieved August 18, 2019, from https://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/
Vandoninck, S., Dhaenens, L., & Donoso, V. (2010). Digital Literacy of Flemish Youth: How do they handle online content risks? Communications, 35(4). doi: 10.1515/comm.2010.021
Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and Social Media Technology in the Family Context. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 150–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02101.x
Yen, J.-Y., Yen, C.-F., Chen, C.-C., Chen, S.-H., & Ko, C.-H. (2007). Family Factors of Internet Addiction and Substance Use Experience in Taiwanese Adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 323–329. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9948
Zhao, S. (2009). Parental education and childrens online health information seeking: Beyond the digital divide debate. Social Science & Medicine, 69(10), 1501–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.039
Journal of Information Technology Management
Volume 12, Issue 2
Proceedings of The 6'th International Conference on Communication Management and Information Technology (ICCMIT'20)
2020
Pages 163-183

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics